the effectiveness of unreasonable math

Scott asked if there is something mysterious about math and, naturally, in the comments "the unreasonable effectiveness of math" came up; i.e. "why the structures that mathematicians found to be important for their own internal reasons, so often turn out to be the same structures that are important for physics". I wrote the following in response.

One should keep in mind that “the unreasonable effectiveness of math” is possible because the weirdness (e.g. the Banach-Tarski paradox) can be contained and e.g. Goedel’s result does not show up (but it could have, e.g. sums over all possible manifolds in 4d quantum gravity).
But one should also keep in mind that large parts of e.g. the standard model are not even based on well-defined (axiomatic) math, rather a patchwork of “physicist’s math” and the real mystery is why this works.

In other words, the real mystery is "the effectiveness of unreasonable math", an idea which goes back to Vaihinger and his philosophy of "as if".

2 comments:

Lee said...

If you haven't read Wigner's essay recently, you might enjoy reading it again. A link is below. Although the title of the essay is often quoted, I think it is a little misleading as to what was said in the text. Anyway, it's always fun to read what really bright people have to say in the area of their expertise, even if it was from a while ago.

https://www.dartmouth.edu/~matc/MathDrama/reading/Wigner.html

wolfgang said...

thank you for the link